MONISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1362/2025 · 2025-09-24
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1362 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
2. Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the charge sheet No. 351 Of 2024 dated 11.11.2024 as well as Summoning order dated 30.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -II Sitapur and stay the proceedings in FIR No. 301 of 2024, Under Section 115 (2), 352, 351 (2), 191 (2) BNS, Police Station -Sandna, District - Sitapur pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -II Sitapur, during the pendency of this Petition/application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Monish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 24, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 1362 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench