Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY Ig TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12944 OF 2025 Between: W/o. Venkataiah Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Thirunampalli (v), Penagaluru Mandal Konduru, Annamaya District.
2. M. Krishnaiah, S/o. PeddaNarasimhulu, Aged about 54 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Thirunampalli (v), Penagaluru Mandal, Konduru, Annamaya District.
1. M Ramullamma ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati.
2. The Joint Collector, O/o District Collector, Annamaya District.
3. The Tahsildar, Pengaluru Mandal, Annamaya District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd Respondent D.Dis.No.(E1 )/582/2020 Dt. 26.03.2025as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, one without jurisdiction and
A r violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same.
lA NO; I OF 2025 Petition qnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend proceedings issued by the 2nd Respondent vide D.Dis.No.(E1)/582/2020 Dt. 26.03.2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) APHC010222642025 [3329] THURSDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITK^M NO: 12944/2025 Between; M Ramullamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND ...rESPONDENT(S) State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1 .KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR REVENUE The
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12944/2025 The Court made the following Order: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief:
“ ... may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ
Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd Respondent D Dis No E1/582/2020 Dt 26 03 2025as illegal arbitrary contrary to law one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14 21 and If 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently setaside the same and pass such... ” Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
2. learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. The claim of the petitioners is that the petitioners were assigned the subject land to an extent of Ac.1.97 cents in Sy.No.37/2 in favor of petitioner No.1 and Ac.1.04 cents in Sy.No.37/1 in favor of petitioner No.2of Thirunampalli Village, Penagaluru Mandal, Konduru, Annamaya District. In view of the complaint made by the MLA Railway Koduru, the 2"^^ respondent herein passed an order dated 26.03.2025 that the petitioners not granted pattas as contended by them. Therefore, the
3. were
Tahsildar directed to resume the land to the Government under proper panchanama and after following due process. Hence, the present writ petition. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader
4. submits that the order impugned dated 26.03.2025 passed by the 2^^^ respondent is applicable before the commissioner of appellate, and if the petitioners prefers an appeal, the same would be considered in accordance with law. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel
5. for both parties and the material on record, this court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of directing the petitioner herein to submit a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such submission, the appellate authority shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as stock holders if any, within a period of six (06) months thereafter. In the meantime. Status Quo obtained as on today in respect of the subject property shall be maintained by both parties. m t With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/-U.SR; DEVs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTIO^DFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2.
The Joint Collector, O/o District Collector, Annamaya District. 3. The Tahsildar, Pengaluru Mandal, Annamaya District. 4. One CC to Sri. Kanakala Devi Prasannakumar Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
6. Three CD Copies GSC
/ HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.12944 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS