Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16693 (GAU)

TAHIRUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1822/2025 · 2025-08-31

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010166002025 2025:GAU-AS:11721 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1822/2025 TAHIRUL ISLAM S/O- SATTAR ALI. R/O- CHAR KUKURMARA, P.S.- MANKACHAR, DIST.- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MS J AKTAR,MR A K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 01.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Tahirul Islam, apprehending arrest in connection with Mankachar P.S. Case No. 134/2024 registered u/s 120(B)/353/336/379/411 IPC R/W Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Page No.# 2/2 Preservation Act, 2021. 3. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he was the part of group of people including cattle smugglers who attacked upon the police with sharp weapons, stones etc. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the accused including the present petitioner showing his participation in the alleged act. 5. Perusal of case diary reveals sufficient incriminating material against the present petitioner. 6. Therefore, this Court finds it not a fit case to grant the privilege of pre- arrest bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the pre-arrest bail application stands rejected. 8. Return the case diary. 9. This disposes of the anticipatory bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant