Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166920 (ALL)

SAMAYDIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/11604/2025 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11604 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents as well as Sri Anil Kumar Tripathi who appears for the opposite party no.3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that his post retiral dues have not been paid. 3. Considering the fact that the dues are to be paid by the respondent no.3, the present petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no.3 who shall consider the same and decided within a period of six weeks from the same being filed. September 26, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Tripathi (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Samaydin .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench