Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166919 (MAD)

T.Arunkumar v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/28623/2025 · 2025-10-14

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :14.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 T.Arunkumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, The District Collectorate Office, Dindigul - 624004. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul - 624601. 3. The Tahsildar, Land Survey Department, Tahsildar Office, Palani - 624601. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Palani Taluk, Dindigul - 624 601. 5. The Surveyor, Palani Taluk, Dindigul – 624601. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2025 and further direct to conduct enquiry and pass the final order within a time frame may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. C.Ezhilarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader O R D E R The petitioner had applied for the conduct of a survey in respect of the land in survey No.246/33. By alleging that the survey was not properly conducted on 30.05.2025, after submitting representations dated 02.06.2025, 15.07.2025 and 13.08.2025 seeking an inquiry and action against the fourth and fifth respondents herein, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents. He has placed on record the survey report indicating that the petitioner acknowledged the conduct of such survey on 30.05.2025. In addition, by referring to the petitioner's representations, he points out that the petitioner has also admitted therein that the survey 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 was conducted. As regards the representations of the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader submits that it is entirely within the discretion of the senior revenue department officials to decide whether disciplinary action should be taken and that this Writ Petition is not maintainable for such purpose. 3. Learned Special Government Pleader has placed on record the survey report. The said report contains the acknowledgement of the petitioner in relation to the conduct of survey on 30.05.2025. It also records that the petitioner was consequently made aware of the boundaries of his property. 4. In this factual context, on the basis that the petitioner was dissatisfied with the survey, no case is made out to issue a mandamus directing an inquiry as prayed for by the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. NCS : Yes/No 14.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 To 1. The District Collector, The District Collectorate Office, Dindigul - 624004. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul - 624601. 3. The Tahsildar, Land Survey Department, Tahsildar Office, Palani - 624601. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Palani Taluk, Dindigul - 624 601. 5. The Surveyor, Palani Taluk, Dindigul – 624601. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J. apd ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 28623 of 2025 14.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis