HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8262 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Sri Yaduvansh Mani Singh, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Yaduvansh Mani Singh learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 , learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.4112/2023 (State Versus Vinay Kumar Shukla) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Senior Division, Sultanpur initiated against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned charge sheet dated 21.2 1999 arising out of Case Crime No.32/1999, Under Sections- 326, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Gauriganj, District Sultanpur (now Amethi) as well as charge framing order dated 17.10.2002 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.22, Sultanpur in terms of the compromise deed dated 4.9.2025, as contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 to this Petition.. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that under some misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicants and thereafter, the parties have amicably compromised Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Kant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Kumar Shukla @ Binnu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 4.9.2025, which has been annexed as annexure no. 5 to the instant application. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the applicants are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicants and thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicants and the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. 6. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. 7. Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 8. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 9. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 10. For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the Criminal Case No.4112/2023 (State Versus Vinay Kumar Shukla) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Senior Division, Sultanpur , shall remain stayed so far as applicants are concerned. 11. The trial Court is directed to examine the fact that whether all the parties A482 No. 8262 of 2025 2 against whom the chargesheet was filed, the party in the compromise and in this respect, it shall also sent a report along with the verification order. 12. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. September 24, 2025 Anuj Singh A482 No. 8262 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench