BACHCHA RAM v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SHRAWASTI DISTT. SHRAWASTI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9501/2025 · 2025-09-26
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166874 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166874 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9501 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the police verification report dated 08.06.2025, by which the opposite party No.3 has submitted the report before the opposite party No.2 thereby not recommended for renewal of the character certificate of the petitioner on the ground of pendency of one criminal case against him, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition."
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that his application for issuance of character certificate has been rejected on the ground of pendency of a criminal case. He has also pointed out the judgement and order dated 28.05.2025 passed in Writ-C No.718 of 2025 and other connected matters, a copy of which has also been filed as annexure-5 to the writ petition. 4. The order of rejection is set aside with a further direction to the District Magistrate, Shrawasti, to consider issuance of character certificate to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bachcha Ram .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate Shrawasti Distt. Shrawasti And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner strictly in the light of observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ-C No.718 of 2025: Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others. The application which has already been submitted by the petitioner shall stand revived consequent to our quashing the order of rejection. 5. Let the Competent Authority comply with the judgement rendered in Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others passed in Writ-C No.718 of 2025, and pass a fresh order within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 6. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 9501 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs.
Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench