IJARAT AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9265/2025 · 2025-09-24
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9265 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Subodh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Range Case No.24 of 2015-16, under Sections 9, 44a, 48(a), 51(1) of Wild Life Protection Act and Section 26 of Indian Forest, registered at Range Dakshin Nighasan, District Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a range case filed against 6 persons, including the applicants, stating that the accused persons were apprehended inside a reserve forest, co-accused Naushad was carrying a plastic sack from which blood was dripping. All the accused persons went away threatening the forest officials. Four kg Turtle flesh was recovered from the sack. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. The involvement of the applicant Nos.1 & 2 has been disclosed in paras 15 & 16 of the affidavit, in which they have been granted bail. The applicant No.2 is involved in two other cases mentioned in paras 17 & 18 of the affidavit and he has also been granted bail in the cases in which he is involved. The applicant No.4 is involved in a solitary case, in which he has been granted bail. 5. The alleged offences carry a maximum punishment up to 3 years. 6. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the application but he could not dispute the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Subodh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ijarat And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid facts. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicants - Ijarat, Samim, Acchan and Munshi be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9265 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench