Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166857 (ALL)

JEESHAN AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

CRLP/9102/2025 · 2025-10-10

Abdul Moin, Pramod Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9102 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. October 10, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Singh, Ashish Gautam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shikhar Anand (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Jeeshan Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench