MOHD. AZAD ANSARI (PNO-170952941) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. U.P., LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11409/2025 · 2025-09-24
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11409 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 23.06.2025 for transfer of the petitioner from District Amethi to District Shrawasti in the light of the G.O. No.3/2018/1/3/96-Ka-4-2018 dated 29.03.2018 which is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the writ petition."
3. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the above prayer.
4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2 to look into and consider the claim of the petitioner as raised in his representation dated 23.06.2025 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
September 24, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pintoo Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) Mohd. Azad Ansari (Pno-170952941) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. U.P., Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench