Smt Sofiya Bee Mohammed Isag v. khairnisa shaikh mohammed isaq
CA/8062/2025 · 2025-09-16
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16685 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16685 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 8062.25CA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8062 OF 2025 IN SAST/29443/2024 SMT SOFIYA BEE MOHAMMED ISAG VERSUS KHAIRNISA SHAIKH MOHAMMED ISAQ ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.H.I.Pathan …
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 16.09.2025 P.C. : 1] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to non removal of office objections, the Second Appeal was dismissed for non prosecution by the Registrar [Judicial] by order dated 11.12.2024. He further submits that he failed to notice listing of the matter before the Registrar [Judicial], as such, he could not remove the office objections within stipulated time. He further submits that there is delay of 98 days in filing the present application and the same is not intentional and deliberate act on the part of the applicant. 2] For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed. Delay of 98 days is condoned. The
order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the Registrar [Judicial] is quashed and set aside to the extent of the present applicant 2025:BHC-AUG:25151
2 8062.25CA and the matter is restored to it’s original position. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. 3] List Second Appeal for admission hearing on
07.11.2025.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC