ADITYA KASHYAP @ SHIBBU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9192/2025 · 2025-09-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9192 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Praveen Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.22 of 2025, under Sections 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Dhanepur, District Gonda. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in two cases, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant is said to be involved in three other cases, in all of which he has been granted bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.08.2025. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and she has submitted that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 6. Prima facie it appears that the applicant has been implicated in the present case merely because he has a criminal history. There appears to be no reasonable ground for prima facie believing that the applicant is guilty of the offence alleged. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Tripathi, Sudha Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aditya Kashyap @ Shibbu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. The minimum punishment which can be imposed in case of the applicant's conviction is imprisonment for two years. 8. There is nothing on record which may give rise to a reasonable apprehension that the applicant may tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses or that the applicant will abscond and will not face the trial or that he is likely to commit any other offence in case he is released on bail. 9. In view of the aforesaid discussion, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Aditya Kashyap @ Shibbu be released on bail in the case registered under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned subject to following conditions: (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 25, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9192 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench