Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16684 (JHR)

RAJA BABU ALIAS DIWAKAR KUMAR ALIAS SAHDEV SAW ALIAS SAHDEO SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3278/2025 · 2025-06-16

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15688 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3278 of 2025 ------ Raja Babu @ Diwakar Kumar @ Sahdev Saw @ Sahdeo Saw, aged about 27 years, Son of Falali Mahto, Resident of House No. 72, Village-Kundouri, P.O.-Tupkadih, Baradi, P.S.-Balidih, District-Bokaro, Pin-827010 (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A.P.P. ----- 02/ 16.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under Section 47(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and 52 (d) of Jharkhand Excise Act, in connection with CP (Excise) Case No. 247 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, a huge quantity of liquor was found in the forest area. The villagers stated that it is this petitioner who was brewing this illicit liquor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is nothing to suggest that the petitioner is involved in this case. 5. The learned A.P.P. opposes and submits that the petitioner was dealing with spurious liquor. He also submits that there are two other criminal cases against the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:15688 2 6. Considering the nature and the fact of the case this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Rashmi/Cp-3