Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16683 (RAJ)

CHETAN SHARMA S/O BHANWARLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5503/2025 · 2025-07-22

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5503/2025 Chetan Sharma S/o Bhanwarlal, R/o Plot No. E 32, Yogi Marg, Mazdoor Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Gopal Chand, ASI, P.S. Shyam Nagar, Jaipur is present in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.460/2024 registered at Police Station- Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(4) and 61(2)(b) of the BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegations against the accused-petitioners in charge-sheet are of committing cheating only. No data has been recovered from his desktop neither sent to the FSL, which is affirmed by the Investigating Officer-Gopal Chand who is present in person today. He further submits that the petitioner has neither signed nor [2025:RJ-JP:27333] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5503/2025] witnessed any documents. He submits that the charges levelled against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate and no custodial interrogation is required. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.04.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Chetan Sharma S/o Bhanwarlal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/81