Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144750 Court No. - 83 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1079 of 2025 Appellant :- Tusar Tyagi @ Golu Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Avinash Pandey,Mohit Kumar Singh,Sujata Choudhary Counsel for Respondent :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,G.A. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for setting aside the impugned order dated 19.11.2024 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act/ Addl. Sessions Judge, Meerut, in Third Bail Application No. 7161 of 2024, arising out of Special Sessions Trial No. 42 of 2021, Case Crime No. 351 of 2020, under Sections 302, 201 IPC read with Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act, P.S. Parikshitgarh, District Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant- applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to press any new ground before this court to consider the release of present appellant or with regard to any material change in the circumstanes. The submissions raised have already been dealt with by the co-ordinate bench of this Court. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the trial court has already appreciated the evidence on record and there is no occasion to interfere with the findings recorded by the trial court. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as AGA has opposed the prayer for bail 6. I have considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the entire record including the impugned order carefully. 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, the Court is of the opinion that the appellant is not entitled to bail. 8. Accordingly, the appeal lacks merit and is hereby dismissed. Trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 RavindraKSingh Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad