PARAMJEET SINGH @ PAMPA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NA528/1368/2025 · 2025-09-24
Shree Prakash Singh
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1368 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. By means of the instant applicant, the applicants has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioners to file separate sureties and bonds in two cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of both the cases. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that it has become impossible for the applicants to submit separate sureties and bonds in two cases, in which, they have been granted bail. He added that the applicants have been granted bail in two cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers:- A. Case Crime No. 155/2025, U/S-303(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station- Madiyaon, District- Lucknow. B. Case Crime No. 5/2025, U/S-303(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station- Jankipuram, District- Lucknow. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicants are still in jail. Being poor persons, they are unable to produce the sureties in two cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhaker Prakash, Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Paramjeet Singh @ Pampa And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicants may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to each of the applicants to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in the other case also wherein the bail order has been passed.
September 24, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 1368 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench