SHREE NEELKANTHESHWAR MAHADEV SHIV TEMPLE THR.PRESIDENT SARNAKAR SEWA SAMITI SRI PUTAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1019/2025 · 2025-09-25
Prashant Kumar, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1019 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. This PIL has been filed by Shree Neelkantheshwar Mahadev Shiv Temple situated at Village Harpalpur, Police Station Harpalpur, District Hardoi through its President Sarvarakar Sewa Samiti Sri Putan Singh son of Bhup Singh resident of Village and Police Station Harpalpur, Tehsil Savayajpur, District Hardoi seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to immediately stop and remove the illegal boundary wall/construction raised on the temple premises. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the authorities to secure and protect the temple land and ensure that the devotees' right to worship is not obstructed in any manner. (iii) issue a writ, order or direction in any nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iv) award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner."
2. However, learned Standing Counsel states that the son of Putan Singh namely Ashok Kumar Singh is defendant no.1 in a Suit filed by the father Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sant Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shree Neelkantheshwar Mahadev Shiv Temple Thr.President Sarnakar Sewa Samiti Sri Putan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
of private respondent nos.5 & 6 bearing Suit No.26 of 2000 in respect of the land over which temple exists. He further says that though Putan Singh claims himself to be the Sarvarakar of the aforesaid temple but without annexing any document in support thereof.
3. Considering the aforesaid facts, which have not been disclosed, it is not a fit case for proceeding any further.
4. Without interfering in the matter, this PIL is disposed of. September 25, 2025 S.P.
WPIL No. 1019 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench