[2025:RJ-JP:23380] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5520/2025 Sagarmal S/o Govindram, R/o Dhani Dala Ki Tan, Village Gadhtaknet, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar. (Presently He Is Behind The Bars At Sub Jail, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar Since The Date Of His Arrest). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5983/2025 Ramniwas S/o Hemaram, R/o Badi Dhani, Tan Gadhtaknet, Police Station Ajeetgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6007/2025 1. Mahavir Singh @ Chhotu Son Of Banwari Lal, Resident Of Dhani Dhala Ki, Tan Village Garhtaknet, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar ( At Present Accused Petitoner Is Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar) 2. Banwari Lal Son Of Shimbhu Ram, Resident Of Dhani Dhala Ki, Tan Village Garhtaknet, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar ( At Present Accused Petitoner Is Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:23380] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5520/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Gayatri Rathore, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kuri in CRLMB No.5520/2025 Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kuri for Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta in CRLMB No.5983/2025 Mr. Pradeep Kalwania in CRLMB No.6007/2025 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioners have filed these three bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.133/2025 registered with the Police Station Ajitgarh, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 109(1) & 309(4) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material made available on record. 4. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners and on perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that no specific overt act has been assigned to any of the accused-petitioners, though as many as forty four persons have been made accused in this case, further all the injuries sustained by the injured-complainant party are found to be simple in nature and the accused-petitioners are in custody for [2025:RJ-JP:23380] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5520/2025] last more than two and a half month, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, all these three bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in each connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /8-10