Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166790 (ALL)

DINESH SINGH @ DINESH KUMAR SINGH @ DINESH @ D.K. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/9193/2025 · 2025-09-25

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9193 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.775 of 2024, under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mohammadpur Khala, District Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged against a single named accused person Satish Chand Sharma stating that complainant has made investments in Loni Urban Multi State Credit and Thrift Cooperative Society but no return was paid on the investments to him. 4. The applicant has been subsequently implicated as he was the Chairman of the society. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in 47 other cases of similar nature has been disclosed in para 20 of the affidavit and he has already been granted bail in 16 bases. 6. A co-accused person Uttam Kumar Singh Rajpoot @ Uttam Singh Rajput has been granted anticipatory bail in the present case. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and she has submitted Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Krishna Srivastava, Mohan Lal Sahu, Surendra Kumar Tripathi, Sweta Swarankar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Singh @ Dinesh @ D.K. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the facts that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; that that the allegations in the F.I.R. is regarding non return of investments made in the society; that the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.11.2024 and even the investigation could not be concluded in a period of about an year and that the co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant - Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Singh @ Dinesh @ D.K. be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 25, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9193 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench