Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010165562025
2025:GAU-AS:12278
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/803/2025 ARUP HAZARIKA SON OF MAHENDRA HAZARIKA RESIDENT OF VILL- NAM-BAGHMORA P.O. CHARIALI, PIN-784176, P.S. BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM. VERSUS MD IMRAN HUSSAIN SON OF MD. SAMSHUL ISLAM R/O VILL- NO. 1 ADABHETI P.O. TEWARIPAL, PIN-784175, P.S. SOOTEA DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BORDOLOI, MS M NIROLA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M ALAM, Linked Case : OTC/0/0 ARUP HAZARIKA ASSAM VERSUS MD IMRAN HUSSAIIN
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : RAVI SHANKAR MISHRA Advocate for : appearing for MD IMRAN HUSSAIIN Linked Case : EC/0/0 ARUP HAZARIKA ASSAM VERSUS MD IMRAN HUSSAIN ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : RAVI SHANKAR MISHRA Advocate for : appearing for MD IMRAN HUSSAIN
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER 09.09.2025
Heard Mr. P. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. M. Alam, learned counsel for the complainant.
2. Mr. P. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the applicant, who in the context of criminal revision petition sought to be preferred against
judgment and order dated 16.08.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No.04(S-1)/2022 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Biswanath, Biswanath Chariali – is praying for condonation of delay of 245 days in
Page No.# 3/3 preferring the criminal revision.
3. Upon being noticed, the respondent no.2/complainant enters appearance through learned counsel Mr. M. Alam.
4. Both the learned counsels submit that in the meantime, the applicant/appellant has paid the cheque amount to the complainant.
5. In the given circumstances, the delay though on the higher side, is hereby condoned in the interest of justice and in the projected circumstances.
3. This I.A stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant