UMESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/9315/2025 · 2025-09-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9315 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Gyanendra Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Mohd. Asif Khan, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Range Case No.29 of 2018-19, under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31, 39, 50, 51, 52 of Wildlife Protection Act, registered at Range Kakraha, District Bahraich. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a range case filed against 8 persons, including the applicant, stating that 7-8 persons were trying to catch wild boars for slaughtering. One persons Ramanand was arrested and in his custodial statement, he named other persons including the applicant. 4. Co-accused Ramanand has already been granted by means of an order dated 09.10.2018 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Bail Application No.8532 of 2018. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 6. The applicant's involvement in three other criminal cases has been disclosed in the affidavit, in one of which he has been granted bail and in rest of the cases he has not received any summon. 7. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the bail application but he could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gyanendra Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Umesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Umesh be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
September 25, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9315 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench