VILLAGERS OF VILAGE KAUSHALPUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6290/2025 · 2025-04-28
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16673 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16673 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17707] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6290/2025
1. Villagers Of Vilage Kaushalpur, Gram Panchayat- Bagherikalan, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, District-Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) Through Authorized Signatory Daleep Singh Yadav.
2. Daleep Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Leelaram Yadav, Aged About 72 Years, Village-Kaushalpur, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, District-Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary To The Government, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. District Collector, District-Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.).
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Kishangarh Bas, District- Khairthal-Tijara(Raj.).
4. The Tehsildar, Kishangarh Bas, District-Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Dinesh Yadav JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 28/04/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for speedy disposal of the representation submitted by the petitioner before the respondent-authorities.
2. Considering the above prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondent-Authority to decide the representation
[2025:RJ-JP:17707] (2 of 2) [CW-6290/2025] (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
3. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
4. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the appeal of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /153