Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166716 (ALL)

SUSHIL KUMAR @ SUSHEEL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11389/2025 · 2025-09-23

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11389 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 & 2 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2. At the very outset, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, on the basis of instructions given by the District Basic Education Officer, Shravasti, states that the order impugned dated 04.03.2025 , a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled from the date of initial appointment itself, may be set aside with liberty to the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 3. Considering the aforesaid, the order impugned dated 04.03.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, is set aside. 4. Consequences to follow. 5. However, it would be open for the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. September 23, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Abdul Moin,J.) Sushil Kumar @ Susheel Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench