HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9525 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bharat Pandey who appears for the respondent bank. 2. The counsel for the petitioner states that the auction purchaser is intending to the sell the properties, however, the application filed, prima- facie does not disclose any assertion to that effect along with the documents, as shown across the Bar. 3. The petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a better application before the DRT concerned, which shall be decided in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Khare, Ishwar Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Brajendra Amiy (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) M/S Kashetriya Shree Gandhi Ashram Thru. Its Secy. Sh. Yashwant Pal .....Petitioner(s) P.N.B. Circle Sastra Meerut Thru. Its Authrised Officer,And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench