Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16671 (JHR)

LILMUNI HEMBROM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5263/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17418] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5263 of 2025 ------ 1. Lilmuni Hembrom, aged about 31 years, wife of Shibu Marandi; 2. Ramesh Marandi @ Dhana Marandi, aged about 31 years, son of Late Gajo @ Gayo Marandi @ Kagru Marandi @ Bhagru Marandi Both residents of Village & P.O.- Nawahar, P.S.- Bengabad, District- Giridih; .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhash Ch. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection Bengabad P.S. Case No.169 of 2024 (Sessions Trial No.153 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238 (a) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed the murder of Sugan Marandi and caused disappearance of evidence of his murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and except suspicion, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 25.11.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.169 of 2024 (Sessions Trial No.153 of 2025) with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/