HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5765 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the Interim Relief Application pending in Appeal No. 827 of 2025, U/S 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act (Shiv Prasad and others Vs. Raj Karan) expeditiously. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the stay application filed along with aforesaid case. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1 - Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Ayodhya, District - Ayodhya to consider and decide Interim Relief Application pending in Appeal No. 827 of 2025, U/S 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act (Shiv Prasad and others Vs. Raj Karan) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashansa Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajesh .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. September 23, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5765 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench