Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16668 (RAJ)

TARA CHAND SHARMA v. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONANDANR

CW/6886/2018 · 2025-02-17

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6886/2018 Tara Chand Sharma S/o Shri Udda Lal Sharma, R/o 124-A, Mahaveer Colony, Toll Tax, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan High Court Bar Association Through General Secretary, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Chamber Allotment Committee, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Through Registrar General ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Joshi, Mr. Akshay Dadhich For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/02/2025 1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by petitioner wayback on 23.03.2018, making following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to allot the chamber in favour of petitioner. ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to revise the list of chamber allotment and thereby include the name of petitioner in chamber allotment list. iii)by appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to accommodate the advocates in the chambers already existing in the old building as some of the chambers are under personed. iv) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner." [2025:RJ-JP:6940] (2 of 2) [CW-6886/2018] 2. Earlier, when the matter was heard by the Coordinate Bench on 06.01.2025, following order was passed:- "This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to allot a chamber to the petitioner. However, despite repeated requests of this Court, the petitioner, present in person, is not able to satisfy as to his entitlement for allotment of the chamber. Still, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to do so. List the matter on 17.02.2025 as prayed." 3. After arguing the writ petition, a prayer for withdrawal of the present writ petition has been made on behalf of petitioner with liberty to make a representation before the respondents, for redressal of his grievance, in respect of allotment of chamber. 4. In view of above, without entering into merits/ demerits of the present case, instant writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/36