Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19769 RP No. 74 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 74 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
S.RAJESH S/O LATE SRINIVAS.V., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.18, GROUND FLOOR, NETHAJI ROAD, RAJU LAYOUT, BEHIND NEHRU MEMORIAL SCHOOL, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 056. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THIPPESWAMY.J.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, B.M.T.C. EAST ZONE, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, HEREIN REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER, B.M.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. …RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19769 RP No. 74 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Thippeswamy., counsel for the review petitioner has appeared in person. The captioned Review Petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections for the second time and it is heard.
The Review petition is filed seeking a review of the order dated:25.10.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.14106/2024 (L-KSRTC). The review petitioner was the respondent in the Writ Petition, he was served and unrepresented. He had neither engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition on the merits of the case. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. The Review Petition is liable to be rejected and accordingly, it is rejected. Because of the rejection of the Review Petition, pending interlocutory applications stands disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2