Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166679 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. SMT. NEHA PRAKASH, DIRECTOR TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT U.P. NEAR BANS MANDI LKO.

CAPL/4190/2024 · 2025-03-06

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13785 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4190 of 2024 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- Smt. Neha Prakash, Director Training And Employment U.P. Near Bans Mandi Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Dwivedi,Pradeep Chandola Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for the alleged non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 01.07.2024 passed by this court in Writ A No. 4836 of 2024. The relevant extract of the said judgment is quoted hereinbelow:- "6. Be that as it may, since the petitioner is praying for the benefit in terms of the Government Order dated 06.10.2016, he has also making prayer to pay the pension and other post retiral dues, therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage directing the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Director Training & Employment, U.P., Directorate Training & Employment, U.P., Bansmandi Chauraha, Lucknow to consider and decide the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law if there is no legal impediment, and he may be paid the aforesaid admissible benefits with expedition preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order." 2. The compliance affidavit has been filed in the present contempt application enclosing therein the copy of the decision on the representation of the applicant in pursuance of the judgment and order passed by the writ court. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous, but liberty may be given to the applicant to challenge the decision dated 23.10.2024 by availing the remedy as may be permissible under the law. 4. Accordingly, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench