Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16667 (RAJ)

HANSBALA v. STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENTORS

CW/19682/2012 · 2025-02-17

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7754] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19682/2012 Hansbala D/o Late Shri Sahi Ram Jat, aged about 23 years, R/o Village & Ost Jaguwas, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Raj. Through Principal Secretary Education, Deptt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/02/2025 1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade III or other equivalent post i.e. LDC on compassionate ground with all consequential bene- fits. ii) The respondents may further be directed to with- draw its impugned order dated 17.06.2011 by treating the petitioner under zone of consideration and eligibil- ity for the post in question as per provision of Rules 1996. iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Heard and considered. 3. Upon a perusal of the record, it is noted that the death of the family member, against whom compassionate appointment [2025:RJ-JP:7754] (2 of 2) [CW-19682/2012] is sought, occurred on 19.11.2008. Thereafter, the instant petition was filed seeking compassionate appointment in the Year 2012. The petition has come up on board for hearing for the first time today i.e. in the Year 2025. Ever since the filing of the instant petition, no active steps were taken by the petitioner for the early listing of the matter. 4. As on date, over 17 years have lapsed since the demise of the earning family member, against whom compassionate employment is sought. If compassionate appointment is made now, the same shall be against the object and purpose for which the appointment on compassionate grounds is provided. The whole object of granting compassionate employment is to enable the family to tide over the sudden crisis caused by the instant death of the earning family member. The object is not to give such family a post, much less a post held by the deceased family member. In this regard, reliance can be placed upon the dictum of the Hon’ble Apex Court as enunciated in Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. and Ors. vs. Anusree K.B. reported in AIR 2022 SC 4766. 5. As a result, in light of the foregoing observations, the instant petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /73