Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166659 (ALL)

KALLU AND ANOTHER v. THE BOARD OF REVENUE KAISARBAG, LUCKNOW THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS

/5750/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5750 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Pankaj Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 and 3 and Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the revision which has been registered as a revision no. 2128 of 2019 Kallu and another Vs. Gram Panchayat Khwajapur, Pargana, Tehsil Salon, district Raebareli and others contained as Annexure No.1 within stipulated period in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 is desired to make all endeavor to decide the revision which has been registered as a revision no. 2128 of 2019 Kallu and another Vs. Gram Panchayat Khwajapur, Pargana, Tehsil Salon, district Raebareli and others, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Kallu And Another .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue Kaisarbag, Lucknow Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioners undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5750 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench