MRS.NAJMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/5911/2025 · 2025-09-26
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166646 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166646 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5911 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private- respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the Case No.236 of 2018. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.236 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Devesh Mishra, Kaushal Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Mrs.Najma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench