Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16664 (KAR)

RAMA MESTHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4414/2021 · 2025-01-21

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2431 WP No. 4414 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4414 OF 2021 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: RAMA MESTHA S/O APPANNA MESTHA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/A ALIVE GADDE HOUSE, SHIROOR VILLAGE, BYNDOOR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK MESTA.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KETHAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMETN OF CO-OPERATIVE, M.S.BUILDING, DR B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI-576 001. 3. PRESIDENT, SHREE DURGAMBIKA SEVA SANGHA, KOTE MANE SHIROOR, BYNDOOR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI. P.N.HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R3) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2431 WP No. 4414 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Ashok Mesta., counsel on behalf of Sri.Kethan Kumar., for the petitioner, Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 & 2 and Sri.P.N.Hegde., counsel for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. 2. The order dated:12.02.2021 passed by the second respondent vide Annexure-A is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.P.N.Hegde., on instruction submits that pursuant to the recalling of the order dated:09.02.2021, the meeting has been conducted on 13.02.2021. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2431 WP No. 4414 of 2021 The oral submission made by counsel for respondent No.3 is placed on record. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is about recalling of the order dated 09.02.2021. However, after recalling of the order, the meeting has been conducted on 13.02.2021. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 32