APHC010221462024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11289/2024 Between: 1. M INDRUDU, S/O NAGANNA LATE, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- ASST. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISMISSED HALAHARVI P.S, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE OF AP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PERSONNEL AP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGFE, AT KURNOOL. 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGE, AT KURNOOL. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AT KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in dismissing the petitioner from service as Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police 43/2021/R.O.R.NO.875/2023, dated 9- 9-2023 by the 4th respondent and in appeal, vide C.NO.C2/OEPR- vide impugned consequential rejection orders passed D.Dis.No.111/T2/2024, dated 19-2-2024 by the respondent are highly illegal, arbitrary , contrary to the law and also Rule 20 CCA Rules and also unconstitutional and consequentially the Honble Court may pleased to set aside the dismissal orders dated 9-9-2023 and consequential orders in appeal dated 19-2-2024 by declaring that the petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service as ASI with all consequential benefits including seniority etc. and may pass such other order. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the impugned dismissal orders passed R.O.R.No.875/2023, dated C.NO.C2/OEPR-43/2021/ 9-9-2023 by the 4th respondent and consequential rejection orders passed in appeal, vide D.Dis.No.111/T2/2024, dated 19-2-2024 by the 3rd respondent with a further direction to reinstate the petitioner into service as Asst. Sub- Inspector of Police, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and may pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.11289 of 2024 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in dismissing the Petitioner from service as Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police vide No.43/2021/ROR No.875/2023 dated 09.09.2023 by Respondent No.4 and in Appeal vide C.No.C2/OEPR vide impugned consequential rejection orders passed D.Dis.No111/T2/2024 dated 19.02.2024 by the Respondents, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader passed on the instructions dated 21.03.2025 of Respondent No.1, wherein it was stated that the Revision filed by the Petitioner against the impugned order is allowed modifying the penalty of “Dismissal from Service” and Petitioner was reinstated into service with immediate effect. 3. In that view, no cause survives for adjudication in this case and the Writ Petition is accordingly closed granting liberty to the Writ Petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Revision authority in an independently constituted Writ Petition. 4 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 29.07.2025 IS 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.11289 of 2024 Date: 29.07.2025 IS