SMT.CHAMELI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/9516/2025 · 2025-09-26
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9516 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :-
"to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to 5 to provide Police help to the petitioner in the construction of her house in accordance with the order dated 10.02.2012 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Faizabad in Regular Suit No.334/2001 "Chameli Devi Versus Kandhai and Others" and which has been affirmed by this Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 07.11.2024 passed in Second Appeal No: 403 of 2013 "Kandhai Versus Chameli Devi and Others", in the interest of justice, which is contained with this writ petition as Annexure No : 1 and 3." It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner preferred R.S. No.334/2001 [Chameli Devi vs. Kandhai and Others] for permanent injunction against opposite party no.6. Suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner on 10.02.2012 by the Additioanl Civil Judge, (S.D.) Court Room No.14, Faizabad. Opposite party no.6 preferred a first appeal which was dismissed on 23.10.2013. Opposite party no.6 thereafter preferred the second appeal no.403/2013 before this Court which was also rejected on 07.11.2024. Order of the trial court was confirmed after dismissal of the second appeal but whenever the petitioner tries to raise the construction on land Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) :
R.R. Dev Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt.Chameli Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
belonging to the petitioner the respondent no.6 creates obstruction in the same,hence, this petition. The appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the civil court by filing a case for execution. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 mks WRIC No. 9516 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench