HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11278 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2 and Shri Arun Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 & 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed contending that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation the respondents have not paid the amount of gratuity to which the petitioner is entitled. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of 8 weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh, Jitendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi Sunayna Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Deptt. Basic Education Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 23, 2025 J. K. Dinkar WRIA No. 11278 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench