[2025:JHHC:16850] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4987 of 2025 ------ Raunak Kumar Singh aged about 23 years son of Late Ruby Singh, resident of B1 Gurudawara P.O. Mango, P.S.- Mango, District East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato, Advocate Mr. Apurv, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-24-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.11 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons committed murder of Santosh Singh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the specific allegation of firing is upon Rohit Dixit and Bimal Gope @ Takla. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been dragged in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.01.2025 as is evident from para-7 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-17 of the instant Bail Application. It is also submitted that the co- accused with similar allegations has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4191 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.11 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/