Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166610 (ALL)

MO.UMAR v. ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE FINANCE AND REVENUE/ ADDL. COLLECTOR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

/5791/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5791 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present case is for compliance of order dated 30.08.2018 passed in proceedings U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code and order dated 18.03.2025 passed U/S 28 of U.P. L.R. Act, 191. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection and submits that petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by revenue authorities and without approaching the competent authority, present writ petition has been filed. 4. In light of the above, considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual, this Court declines to interfere with the present matter. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is given liberty to move an appropriate application under Para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the said order before the appropriate authority. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed. September 23, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durga Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Mo.Umar .....Petitioner(s) Addl. District Magistrate Finance And Revenue/ Addl. Collector, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench