Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16661 (UTT)

SHREE DEV BHOOMI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/976/2024 · 2025-12-19

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11440 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 9 7 6 / 2 0 2 4 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J 1. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Mahavir Kohli, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 4. This writ petition is filed by Shree Dev Bhoomi Institute of Education Science and Technology, Dehradun seeking the following reliefs: - (i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 06.04.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 (contained as Annexure No. 22 to this writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 & 3 to forthwith register the petitioner’s 3 students in its UMS portal and permit and submit the students’ examination forms so as to enable them to sit for the Annual exams (in the month of May-June, 2024) so that their one year is not ruined. 5. Annexure 22, impugned in the writ petition, is a communication issued by Registrar of University, whereby it was informed that students, who have been given admission without approval of the University, shall not be permitted to get themselves registered with UMS Portal. 2025:UHC:11440 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to an interim order passed by Division Bench on 01.05.2024, all the students, who were given admission in the College, were permitted to participate in the University examination. He submits that in view of order passed by Division Bench, the reliefs, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J) 19.12.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d13 69512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F461 0C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.12.19 05:25:33 -08'00'