VRINDAVAN SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/11312/2025 · 2025-09-23
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166605 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11312 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 3.
2. No notice be issued to respondents no.4 and 5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that although the District Inspect of the Schools vide order dated 14.03.2018, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, has admitted certain dues as payable to the petitioner yet the same have still not been paid and hence the petition.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection.
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vrindavan Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 23, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 11312 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench