RAM NIHAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/9436/2025 · 2025-09-23
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166592 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166592 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9436 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief:
"I- Issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties to direct the opp. party no. 2 & 3 to inquire the matter and take necessary action on the application/complaint moved by petitioner dated 02-09-2025 against the opp. party no. 5 for illegal measurement without any order or legal proceeding with the influence of the Village Pradhan and also take necessary action against the opp. party no. 5/Area Lekhpal for submitting the false inquiry report dated 17-06- 2025 against the revenue record contained as ANNEXURE NO.-1 & 2 to this petition."
3. Considering the fact that the petitioner is affected by the order passed in person and the same requires appreciation of evidence, which cannot be done under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner take such steps as may be available under law either before the revenue court or before the civil court. September 23, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Nihal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench