Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16657 (AP)

Samelu Gogam S/o.Yaakobu Gogam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh'

WP/34494/2015 · 2025-06-30

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010222192015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34494 OF Between: Samelu Gogam S/o.yaakobu Gogam, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALASWAMI 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34494 OF 2015 Samelu Gogam S/o.yaakobu Gogam, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 34494 OF 2015 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in converting the area earmarked for park namely Water Tank Park in Old Singh Nagar, Vijayawada for construction of religious institution is contrary to the provisions of Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Act as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents, on instructions would submit that the park as specified in the Writ Petition was used as park for several years and the Government had taken a decision to protect all the open spaces, parks and play grounds in the State and issued orders vide G.O.Ms.No.72 M.A, dated 20.02.2002 not to allot the parks for any other purposes. 3. In the light of written instructions of learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents, the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 01.07.2025 KK