HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9622 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) as well as Shri Ajay Singh, learned counsel, who has filed his 'vakalatnama' on behalf of the respondent nos.3 to 5, which is taken on record & Shri Suresh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.6 and perused the material brought on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging an order dated 09.07.2025, whereby, the appellate authority has remanded the proceedings for decision afresh. 3. The petitioner, is a mere complainant, considering the fact that no right of the complainant much less an enforceable right, as shown to be effected, writ, as prayed, cannot be issued. 4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. September 26, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Katyayan Mishra, Mahendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Suresh Kumar Yadav (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Chandra Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 4others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench