Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166561 (ALL)

GAYALAL v. UP ZILADHIKARI (JUDICIAL), TEHSIL MANKAPUR, GONDA AND 2 OTHERS

/5795/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5795 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for expeditious disposal of Case No. 3572 of 2021 (Computerize Case No. T202108300703572) Gayalal Vs., Smt. Yashoda Devi and another, U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction for expeditious disposal of the application dated 30.05.2023 for recall of the order dated 25.05.2023 filed in the aforesaid case. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1/ Up-Zila Adhikari (Judicial), Tehsil - Mankapur, District - Gonda is directed to decide the application dated 30.05.2023 for recall of the order dated 25.05.2023 filed in Case No. 3572 of 2021 (Computerize Case No. T202108300703572) Gayalal Vs., Smt. Yashoda Devi and another, U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 , expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surya Narayan Mishra, Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Gayalal .....Petitioner(s) Up Ziladhikari (Judicial), Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5795 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench