BATTILAL JATAV S/O JANGALI JATAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5660/2025 · 2025-05-02
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16655 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16655 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18517] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4948/2025 Subhash S/o Kunjilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Pahadi, Police Station Balghat, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5660/2025 Battilal Jatav S/o Jangali Jatav, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Shekhpura, Police Station Balghat, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timan Singh Mr. Deshraj Sain Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 02/05/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0167/2025 registered at Police Station- Nai Mandi Hindaun, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 8, 21 of the NDPS Act.
2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public
[2025:RJ-JP:18517] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4948/2025] Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. Recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. There are no criminal antecedents against both the petitioners. The petitioner-Subhash S/o Kunjilal is behind the Bar since 25.03.2025 and Battilal Jatav S/o Jangali Jatav is behind the Bar since 04.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Subhash S/o Kunjilal (2) Battilal Jatav S/o Jangali Jatav shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/207-208