MADHAV PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER
/1075/2025 · 2025-09-23
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1075 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Nijam Ahamad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mayank Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 184 of 2017, under Section 420 I.P.C and Section 6/10 of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998, registered at Police Station- Kotwali Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar.
3. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 23, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Madhav Prasad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench