NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BOTI @ GHASIA ORANG AND 5 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/2412/2025 · 2025-07-31
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16654 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16654 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010166022025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2412/2025 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT 87 M.G. ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI 781007 VERSUS BOTI @ GHASIA ORANG AND 5 ORS S/O LATE SAMRA ORANG 2:MISS SITA URANG D/O BOTI @ GHASIA ORANG 3:KARMA URANG S/O BOTI @ GHASIA ORANG 4:MISS LASMI ORANG D/O BOTI @ GHASIA ORANG ALL ARE R/O VILL. POWAI TEA ESTATE NAGAPARA LINE NO. 3 P.S. DIGBOI DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786171 5:RAJENDRA SINGH
Page No.# 2/3 S/O LATE VAYANKAR SINGH R/O NATIONAL PLYWOOD TINSUKIA BALUGADA P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786187 6:RAGHU BANAH SINGH S/O LATE RAM AVATAR SINGH R/O VILL. CHIRAPATTY P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 78612 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MS. M SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : MAC App./5966/2025 (Filing Number) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI ASSAM VERSUS BOTI ALIAS GHASIA ORANG TINSUKIA ASSAM 2:SITA URANG TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:KARMA URANG TINSUKIA ASSAM 4:LASMI ORANG TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:RAJENDRA SINGH TINSUKIA ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3 6:RAGHU BANAH SINGH TINSUKIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MONDAKINI SAIKIA Advocate for : appearing for BOTI ALIAS GHASIA ORANG
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 01.08.2025 Heard Ms. M Saikia, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant.
2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal.
3. I have found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained.
4. At this stage, going for issue of notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer wastage of time.
5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned.
6. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant