MADHAV PRASAD v. NAIB TEHSILDAR MILKIPUR, TEHSIL MILKIPUR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
/5735/2025 · 2025-09-23
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166532 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166532 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5735 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State - respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondent no. 2, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Naib Tehsildar Milkipur, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide the pending case No. RST/6936/2025 (Computerized No. T202504230406936) under Section 209 (Ja) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006
"Madhav Prasad Versus Mohd. Shakeel Khan & others since 17.3.2025 expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible. 4. It has been submitted that the petitioner has filed a restoration application on 17.3.2025 for recall of order dated 22.11.2022 by mentioning cogent reason regarding the delay. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 4. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhey Shyam Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Madhav Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Milkipur, Tehsil Milkipur, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s)
circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the restoration application which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 5. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. .
September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5735 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench