SRI HARI SHANKAR TRIPATHI v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL, KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5719/2025 · 2025-09-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5719 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil, Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide Case No.1668/2024 Computerized Case No.T202402570101668, "Hari Shankar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and others, under Sections 31/32 of the U.P. Revenue Code Bill, 2006", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil, Kunda, District Pratapgarh considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil, Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Case No.1668/2024 Computerized Case No.T202402570101668, "Hari Shankar Tiwari vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Singh, Santosh Kumar Ramakant Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sri Hari Shankar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil, Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
State of U.P. and others, under Sections 31/32 of the U.P. Revenue Code Bill, 2006", expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5719 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench