RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
/11264/2025 · 2025-09-23
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11264 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Privilege Leave Encashment has not been paid though the petitioner has retired way back on 31.7.2025.
3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of Privilege Leave Encashment to the petitioner within three months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. September 23, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Dwijendra Mishra (Abdul Moin,J.) Ramesh Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench